 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) YES! YES! Exactly! --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) By and large, what gives you the impression that they DO respect US? Maybe respect certain individuals who show up at functions and show them how amazing a resource we can be to them, but even then only respect from a random employee or two? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Lego. (...) Not much, but who cares? Using "they don't respect me, so I won't respect them" is circular and self-defeating. (...) I think it's been blown way out of proportion too, but that doesn't change the inherent arguement. If it's (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Here's my quick opinion: TLG has the right to do as they wish with their information, and that includes putting restrictions on how and when (and if) it is made available. TLG doesn't respect us much, if at all, as a corporation now. This whole (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | (...) True, but: 1. I have never seen nor has anyone ever produced anything in _writing_ that indicates that a Vendors catalog is confidential, or privileged information. 2. It is true that they hold them close and don't give them out to everyone. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Mark Koesel
|
| | | | | | | | | "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:FMFtxt.5K6@lugnet.com... [snipped well written, agreeable points throughout] (...) the (...) the (...) This may not be so, Kevin. For this year, Lego has apparently _intentionally_ left (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Do you have any evidence to support the assertion that TLG/C DOES respect us "much" or at all? I bet for every instance of an _individual_ Lego employee showing respect for another individual AFOL we can come up with at least one example of a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) You _knew_ when you wrote that that _someone_ was going to quote you out of context, didn't you? Jasper (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) ya, and you were number 3 on my usual list of suspects, too. (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Well, that's not quite the point -- at least not what I was keying in on in what James wrote. James's point was that our not respecting their intellectual property gives them less reason to respect us, rather than more reason, regardless of (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Yes, I see what you mean. I think it's somewhat irrelevant, but I see what you mean. I think one person posting several crappy scans of soon-to-be released sets (and not all this supposed TOP SECRET marketing material that has been alluded to) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
