To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2727
2726  |  2728
Subject: 
Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:17:46 GMT
Viewed: 
1762 times
  
Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote:
TLG doesn't respect us much, if at all, as a corporation now.

Do you have any evidence to support this?  I bet they're laughing at what
a big deal we made out of this.

Do you have any evidence to support the assertion that TLG/C DOES
respect us "much" or at all?  I bet for every instance of an
_individual_ Lego employee showing respect for another individual
AFOL we can come up with at least one example of a Lego employee
doing the opposite.

And I'm sure they're laughing.  But does that indicate respect, lack
of respect, or nothing at all?

--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) True, but: 1. I have never seen nor has anyone ever produced anything in _writing_ that indicates that a Vendors catalog is confidential, or privileged information. 2. It is true that they hold them close and don't give them out to everyone. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR