To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26368
26367  |  26369
Subject: 
Re: More Election Bad News?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:09:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1579 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
IMO, we should tell religion to shut the heck up re: matters of legislation,

Given the sheer numbers represented by organized religion in this country, and
how strongly many members feel about certain issues, you can shout it until
you're blue in the face, but the only way it'll have any affect is to pass an
ammendment to prevent religion from trying to influence government.  That's not
going to happen.  There's too much of a religious component on both sides of the
Republican/Democrat split, so doing something like that would be political
suicide, not just for the individuals, but for the party as a whole.

and we should recognize homosexual marriage on the same footing as
heterosexual marriage.

Unless the US Supreme Court gets stacked with a socially liberal judiciary, I
doubt that'll ever happen, though it's not unreasonable to expect that they'd
rule to allow same-sex unions to enjoy the same rights and priveledges of
marriages, if not the same name.

If religious groups want to endorse only a certain kind of marital union,
then that's their business.

They already do, in a more mundane sense.  The Catholic church has rules against
recognizing a marriage involving a divorced person.

On a practical note, right now I can describe myself as "married."  What
would be the gerund of choice if my wife and I had entered into a civil
union instead of a marriage?  Will we be "united?"  Or maybe "civved?"  8^)

"Partnered".  Maybe "mated".  Or you could always appeal to the vulger and say
you're "shacked up".



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More Election Bad News?
 
(...) IMO, we should tell religion to shut the heck up re: matters of legislation, and we should recognize homosexual marriage on the same footing as heterosexual marriage. If religious groups want to endorse only a certain kind of marital union, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

17 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR