To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24568
24567  |  24569
Subject: 
Re: Costs and Benefits
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:32:39 GMT
Viewed: 
2798 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> 
> > > The way I figure it, you should only be looking at an individual's consumption
> > > and 'payback.'  I'll use what I consider pretty conservative figures so that the
> > > fact that I'm just making numbers up won't paint a rosier picture than is
> > > reasonable.  So assuming that many more Americans would go to college if it were
> > > "free" we might get up to the point where the average American would attend for
> > > three years.
> > 
> > That does not have to be the case.
> 
> Well, sure.  I wrote that I was making up the numbers.  What exactly do you
> mean?
> 
> > > If we imagine that this costs $15K per year, then we have the
> > > average American sucking $45K out of the system.
> > 
> > Don’t forget a means tested term-time subsistence grant.
> 
> What's that mean?


Students get money for basics; food, accommodation, travel to Uni, etc.

> 
> > > Golly!  I'd been imagining that it would be cheaper.  On the other hand, the
> > > average American doesn't attend for anywhere near three years and it could cost
> > > somewhat less than $15K per year.  If we drop it to two years at $12K per, the
> > > taxpayer burden drops to $600 per year.
> > 
> > I'm really talking about 4 year degree courses. If we set a target of 50% of the
> > population going to Uni, then the average would be two years.
> 
> Well, yeah, so you're agreeing with my number?

I have no idea what the costs are in the USA… sorry!

> 
> > > But, presumably, our GDP and spending
> > > power would rise with a more educated populace.  Presumbably.
> > 
> > Two Points:
> > How much extra taxable income do graduates earn?
> > Would more educated Americans mean the USA would rely less on immigrants?
> 
> Right.  I don't know.  And I don't know how much it would change as the
> university educated population increased.  I'm not sure I care about the
> immigrant situation.  I'm not all about Americans over others.

An educated workforce makes investment more likely.

Scott A

> 
> Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Costs and Benefits
 
(...) Well, sure. I wrote that I was making up the numbers. What exactly do you mean? (...) What's that mean? (...) Well, yeah, so you're agreeing with my number? (...) Right. I don't know. And I don't know how much it would change as the university (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR