 | | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) (URL) we're back to Howard Stern--if you don't like what he has to say (and I don't) then for the love of freedom of choice, turn the radio station. As far as censorship goes--to that old arguement 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre is wrong (unless (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: FORTUNE5.htm (...) One knows what to expect on the Howard Stern show. I don't have a problem with his show, beyond that I think it is stOOpid. One knows what to expect at the Super Bowl, and that is (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) You're forgetting that you were forewarned that the half-time show was being brought to you by the letters M and TV. Even with that 'heads up', you still sit there and say "I didn't know the halftime show was going to be tasteless!"? (...) The (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) That's a local thing - I've heard songs in CA and realized for the first time that they were *NOT* recorded with silence or a bleep during obvious obscenity. Now that I moved out of CA, I get to hear silence again ;-) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) You need to check your anatomy books. The nipple was completely exposed. What was {partially} covered was the areole - (URL) Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ Home (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Where this falls down is in the area of expectations. We can use turning Stern off in advance of his broadcast as an effective way of not listening to what we don't want to listen to, precisely because we have an expectation already set about (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Let's not indulge in sophistries. (...) What part of, "it wasn't," wasn't clear? :-) The star fits over the nipple and has a hole in the middle that the nipple thrusts through (oh, hey, for a technical explanation, that turned out a bit (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) "Community standards." I'm not surprised. Could Howard Stern curse away if he was only in L.A.? :-) -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) I knew I should have checked my spelling on that - I've been spoiled by the "edit" feature on Classic-Castle. -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Of course, there's absolutely no way to implement that policy effectively, or to police it credibly, unless we have a clear, precise, and consistent definition of what qualifies as pornography. Who would care to posit such a definition? (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) She's the 'daily hottie' today, coincidence of coincidences... (URL) be a PG-13 rating on that site--no nudity but some verrry nice pics from the likes of Maxim--so if ya don't like to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) She doesn't seem to take a nice pic--at least in that list o' pics. I completely concur--that makeup--ugh! I'm still stuck on Elin, though.... That's verrry nice... Dave K (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) What!?! I missed that episode! Dang, at least that part of her is real...no, don't tell me if it isn't... -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Luckily, we all have Jerry Springer every day on TV to remind us. Yep, even here in Australia. ROSCO (21 years ago, 9-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, this is another example of how things are better in Canada than in the US. The episode was "Harbinger," and the relevant scene was edited slightly differently for hosers than for Yanks. Dave K gets all the breaks. If my guess is (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) I did see the episode - my virgin eyes were spared by recropping the shot? Not that that sequence made the slightest ounce of sense in regards to Vulcans. T'Pol either was dropped on her pointy ears as a child or is suffering from undiagnosed (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
