 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Review some past posts about the efficacy and need for an outlet, without this safety valve, it's argued that the rest of LUGNET would see unpleasant debates break out. I can't speak for others but I daresay I enjoy debating among friends whom (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | (...) I'd have to agree with Lar here, although it,s true that our debating causes some people to get angry at others on matters that are totally not LEGO-related. I'm not sure the security valve is necessary. I can see myself not even mentionning (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Agreed (...) Just for some sense of appeasement, and maybe know who's who here, (and this is totally not on-topic for off-topic ;) ) but would it be nice to have an o.t-d 'roll call' (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | I'll bite also... (...) (URL) (...) 2 bedroom apartment in Beaverton Oregon, USA, a suburb of Portland. (...) Libertarian And because so much of our debate centers on religion: Unitarian Universalist (...) Masters of Engineering, Computer (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | off-topic.debate roll call —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | Sure, why not.. website: (URL) (commercial... buy something!) (URL) (slushpile of poorly organized stuff) Residence: Ada, Michigan, USA, but can be found practically anywhere in the US (don't seem to travel overseas as much post 911) at any given (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: off-topic.debate roll call —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Wow! you did the ++Lar right out of the gate! And I agree with your stance on the on-topicness of the question. Nice consistency over the years, Larry! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Scott Costello
|
| | | | | | relative OTD newbie jumps in. Website: None yet, I gotta get me one of those Residence: Ontario, Southern California. Political: libertarian with a lower case L, because I don’t agree with all their views, but pro-capitalism, anti-big government, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | (...) How is this a safety valve may i ask? (...) True, but wouldn't debating thru emails work better? (...) True, but it be good to see something lego wise from them. (...) Yep, dats basically it. (...) Cool. (...) I care....because i care. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) "Little things"? "Sport debates"? Talk about inverted priorities...what are you, 12? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, 14. : ) And you say _I_ have inverted priorities? I mean, I'd so much rather uselessly run my mouth about something I'll make sense in rather than something political and making a fool of myself... Or have I done that already? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark. Like some at .debate argue about everything from politics to lego to religion, there are those out there that would rather argue about affairs revolving around sports, cars and movies. So (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, he has his opinions and I have my own. If he can encompass discussions of world politics with the words "little things," I think I am allowed to express an opinion on that comment. As has been commented before: don't like what you read in (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | (...) While is it true that world politics take far more importance over anything else of the sort, I won't go the the extent to demean those whom veer from that discussion. Well, to each his own, I surmise. (...) Yes, the pressure does compound (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya... —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) The reason (if I understand correctly) for having the entire "off-topic" group was for 'safety valve' issues. Otherwise, debates like this that *naturally* creep up inside of on-topic posts would have nowhere to go. You might argue that they (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
