 | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) 1. Most warmongers = imperialistic @$$holes (...) 2. White House says no connection, John ::yawn: (...) 3. Was he disarming or gearing up for war? What chance did we give him? Given the context today, I can tell you what I would have been (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) But what if *we* didn't start the war? If Al-Qaeda is in bed with Saddam, we have *every* right to invade Iraq to pursue those who started this thing on 9-11. (...) Time for you wake-up call: (URL) (...) Wake up and smell the mustard gas. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) John, find me a source citing and proving a preexisting link. I can find you a denial of such a claim on the White House's own webpages (and I have provided that link at least twice in this forum already). Do you have information of value in (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Preexisting when? (...) What? No clever little ad hominem for Tony? Hack. (...) I'll tell you what gives-- what we perceived as the threat to *our* national security was having a madman like Saddam collect WMD who then possibly would pass them (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | John: I honestly think you may be afflicted by a kind of psychosis. You seem to believe that the U.S.' actions in the world should have no repercussions, whereas I am certain that people around the globe are responding to us with extreme negativity. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Your bigotry betrays you... (...) Because of their *own* self-interest. They don't give a rat's patootie about the Iraqi people. What say we let the people of Iraq decide their own destiny. (...) Or we liberate them, and create a valuable ally (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Sounds fair to me. ROSCO (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | But without the war part, right Rosco? -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I see no reason why the people of Iraq shouldn't wage war if they feel it's warranted. Even on the US, UK and Australia if they see them as a potential threat sometime in the future. ROSCO (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Spencer Nowak
|
| | | | | | (...) Um hello? "Before" what? 9-11, all the embassy bombings, WTC bombing #1....? (...) Peace?!?! You are the one single-mindedly attacking people for having differing views from you! (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Is pretty much amazing how this little war has united (most of) the Arab nations in complete and total protest against it. If I were a betting man, I'd say there are probably folks from Saudi Arabia fighting on SH's side--But wait! Aren't the (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
