 | | The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | The anti-war hysteria has become absolutely disgusting-- this makes me sick: (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) People are idiots--have been, probably always will be--lashing out at stuff that hurts their cause. There are radicals that should really get their heads examined. If they think they're helping their POV by doing stupid, idiotic and, quite (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Of course it would be a different kettle of fish-- one is the destruction of public and private property and the other is not. The dirty little secrets are starting to manifest themselves (even to the Left): 1. Most "peace" activists = (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) 1. Most warmongers = imperialistic @$$holes (...) 2. White House says no connection, John ::yawn: (...) 3. Was he disarming or gearing up for war? What chance did we give him? Given the context today, I can tell you what I would have been (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) But what if *we* didn't start the war? If Al-Qaeda is in bed with Saddam, we have *every* right to invade Iraq to pursue those who started this thing on 9-11. (...) Time for you wake-up call: (URL) (...) Wake up and smell the mustard gas. (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) John, find me a source citing and proving a preexisting link. I can find you a denial of such a claim on the White House's own webpages (and I have provided that link at least twice in this forum already). Do you have information of value in (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Preexisting when? (...) What? No clever little ad hominem for Tony? Hack. (...) I'll tell you what gives-- what we perceived as the threat to *our* national security was having a madman like Saddam collect WMD who then possibly would pass them (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | John: I honestly think you may be afflicted by a kind of psychosis. You seem to believe that the U.S.' actions in the world should have no repercussions, whereas I am certain that people around the globe are responding to us with extreme negativity. (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Your bigotry betrays you... (...) Because of their *own* self-interest. They don't give a rat's patootie about the Iraqi people. What say we let the people of Iraq decide their own destiny. (...) Or we liberate them, and create a valuable ally (...) (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Sounds fair to me. ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | | | But without the war part, right Rosco? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I see no reason why the people of Iraq shouldn't wage war if they feel it's warranted. Even on the US, UK and Australia if they see them as a potential threat sometime in the future. ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Spencer Nowak
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Um hello? "Before" what? 9-11, all the embassy bombings, WTC bombing #1....? (...) Peace?!?! You are the one single-mindedly attacking people for having differing views from you! (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Is pretty much amazing how this little war has united (most of) the Arab nations in complete and total protest against it. If I were a betting man, I'd say there are probably folks from Saudi Arabia fighting on SH's side--But wait! Aren't the (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) On what basis? (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) My linking was bad before-- based on this: (URL) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The French Have Gone Too Far —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) to justify war against Saddam - a "nightmare scenario" in which he might eventually pass weapons of mass destruction to terrorists." Now go back and read my last link. ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
