 | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Did I say that? You are obfuscating and being argumentative. (...) I don't even know what that is supposed to mean. (...) I reject your moral equivelance of nations. The second we think we are better is the second that there are second class (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) No, your very posts show me that "America the Great" is what matters, and other ideas be damned. (...) Now look who's misreading--I never said "morally equivelance" at all. Would you please read and understand what is being said. In so many (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Dave: for clarity's sake, let me point out that John is objecting (not incorrectly) to your charge that he is painting the US as the sole provider of blessings, when in fact he merely asserted that the US has produced countless blessings. For (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) True, and I apologize. The America-centric vibe I get from John's posts slanted my readings. I would have said something like, "There are many countries that have contributed 'blessings' to the world, and America has had it's fair share." But (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) No, that's not just you-- I agree with you! I'd probably say "Lion's share", but that's just me:-) (...) Accepted. (...) Ahem. Don't confuse the terms Democracy and Freedom with Capitalism-- they aren't necessarily interchangeable. JOHN (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Then you are going to have to explain what you mean by "we are all equal nations". (...) Thank you. (...) Straw man-- I *never* used the UN to justify *anything*. Contrare, I think that the UN is a sham! I used the example of the UN's decision (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
