Subject:
|
Re: Idealism vs Realism?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:16:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1968 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Then again I also actually know what freedom is (as opposed to
> most of the people living in any Arab country.)
That's an egregiously qualified freedom at best, right? The fact that it is
worse for others doesn't make your/our situation any better; it is only
better by comparison.
-- Hop-frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Idealism vs Realism?
|
| (...) Maybe I am mis-reading you hear (or maybe you mis-read me.) Last time I checked, if I publicly announce I do not like my government 'leaders', I will not be publicly executed later that day. However that is standard in most Arab countries. The (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Idealism vs Realism?
|
| (...) I don't know that they are of less concern but rather at the oppisite end of the spectrum. I was more concerned with the discription than the conclusions the author drew. (...) guns. (...) Well I have the silly notion that the United Nations (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
