Subject:
|
Re: We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Dec 2001 16:02:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
331 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason J. Railton writes:
>
> > Not biting today, huh Loz?
>
> BTW, Every AFOL I know (and some that reject the label but are AFOLs anyway)
> is an Anorak. So what?
Okay, this here Bozo is ignorant. I thought an anorak was some kind of warm
jacket from L.L. Bean.
> > Almost as big a flop as my one about trainheads
> > doing better buildings than the townies.
>
> If you want to start an argument you have to say something CONTROVERSIAL.
> That one is so obviously true it doesn't merit comment. :-)
You mean like the editors of Time magazine selling out and calling Giuliani
Person of the Year because they didn't have the *ahem* guts to give Bin Laden
the label? I mean, come on, if Stalin could make it in 1941 and you-know-who
in 1938....
Maggie C.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
| "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:Got0JI.It6@lugnet.com... (...) Anoraks are indeed a warm jacket. As such, they are commonly worn by Train Spotters - who spend all day on cold station platforms waiting to note down (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
| (...) BTW, Every AFOL I know (and some that reject the label but are AFOLs anyway) is an Anorak. So what? (...) If you want to start an argument you have to say something CONTROVERSIAL. That one is so obviously true it doesn't merit comment. :-) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
