Subject:
|
We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:49:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
253 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason J. Railton writes:
> Not biting today, huh Loz?
BTW, Every AFOL I know (and some that reject the label but are AFOLs anyway)
is an Anorak. So what?
> Almost as big a flop as my one about trainheads
> doing better buildings than the townies.
If you want to start an argument you have to say something CONTROVERSIAL.
That one is so obviously true it doesn't merit comment. :-)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
| (...) Okay, this here Bozo is ignorant. I thought an anorak was some kind of warm jacket from L.L. Bean. (...) You mean like the editors of Time magazine selling out and calling Giuliani Person of the Year because they didn't have the *ahem* guts to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: We're all Anoraks on this bus (was Sadness
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Goszyq.HK0@lugnet.com... (...) Every AFOL is NOT an anorak. Being an anorak is considered a mildly derogatory term - in the UK at least. Though usually used in an amusing, harmless (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Man, you lot are sad
|
| (...) Not biting today, huh Loz? Almost as big a flop as my one about trainheads doing better buildings than the townies. Do these things just not carry across the language barrier? Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
