Subject:
|
Re: The Faith Issue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:22:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
192 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > I haven't noticed it at all on Lugnet. Quite the opposite in fact. Many more
> > times I've seen athiests (etc) try and convince the "Christian at large" that
> > one cannot believe in God, can't take the Bible on faith, etc.
>
> It's probably hostility against the actions of such persons inappropriately
> expressing itself as antipathy for the ideas held by such persons.
For my interest, since on Lugnet I've pursued a more atheist posture than
theist, I would say that my enthusiasm for this debate (elsewhere, as much
as here) stems from my desire to prevent others from legislating their
beliefs and from a standing objection to the assertion that the bible is
inerrant, that it can be verified empirically, and that it is
non-contradictory. Except when participants make it personal--which doesn't
happen often here--I try to reserve my rhetorical aggression for the debate
and not for the debaters.
I've never tried to convince anyone that one can't believe in God--far
from it! I have, however, tried to demonstrate to people that one person's
faith in God, even if that faith is supported by a hundred personal
epiphanies, is insufficient evidence for anyone else to conclude empirically
that God exists. I have also tried to demonstrate to people that casual
"evidence" is not the same as empirical "evidence," and that the two are not
equivalent and cannot be used interchangeably.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: The Faith Issue
|
| (...) It's probably hostility against the actions of such persons inappropriately expressing itself as antipathy for the ideas held by such persons. Just a thought, -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![The Faith Issue -Richard Marchetti (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -David Eaton (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Richard Marchetti (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Richard Marchetti (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Shiri Dori (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Ross Crawford (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Tom Stangl (16-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The Faith Issue -Allan Bedford (17-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|