Subject:
|
Re: When is it appropriate to "take it to email" and when isn't it?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:06:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
161 times
|
| |
| |
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GFB6DI.KC7@lugnet.com...
>
> Here is the question to those that seem to advocate "taking it to email"
> whenever one or more parties to a discussion seem to go out of the bounds of
> normal discourse:
>
> When is this not an appropriate thing to do? Can you, the advocates of that
> course of action, come up with examples of when it isn't? Why isn't it in
> those cases? (or, alternatively, are you saying that "taking it to email" is
> ALWAYS the correct course no matter how bad the social transgression or how
> one sided it might be?)
I think it ALWAYS a reasonable course of action. That doesn't necessarily
make it correct. But I think anything positive which may be lost to the rest
of the participants by "taking it to email" is generally less than the
negative feelings caused by not doing so, which tends to push me to "err on
the side of caution".
Regards
ROSCO (Posting via NNTP to check out the new authentication!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|