Subject:
|
McViegh is no Libertarian
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:24:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
179 times
|
| |
|
|
Snipping all but one statement away to make a key point.
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher Tracey writes:
> <begin quote> (from a mass murderer)
> My one main problem with the "veg" movement (besides the fact that I
> am libertarian)
Judge outcomes not statements...
This creature is no more libertarian than Scott Arthur is. Maybe he forgot
the pledge he signed about not initiating the use of force? Maybe he didn't
actually sign it and just wants to claim to be something he never joined? Or
maybe he's just nutty about the small stuff as well as the big stuff.
Whichever it is, Timothy McVeigh was no libertarian, you can be sure of that.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: McViegh is no Libertarian
|
| (...) that's a good policy.... (...) I'm curious if the "veg" movement and libertarianism are mutually exclusive? I believe you said in a previous thread that you tried to switch your diet once, so I don't think so... just wondering. -chris (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: McViegh is no Libertarian
|
| (...) Maybe you should note the lack of capitalization in the word libertarian. As there is wide variety within the LP, there is even wider variety in the stances of those who could reasonably call themselves 'libertarian.' Thomas Jefferson approved (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
