Subject:
|
Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 27 May 2001 16:50:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
130 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > This is the
> >
> > That should read "This is the most for any state, absolutely or
> > proportionately". Sorry!
>
> Our paper had an editorial yesterday which lambasted Jeffers for doing this.
> The author felt that it was important for the Rebublican party to have
> liberals and the Democratic party to have conservatives, to the point that
> independants weaken the parties.
They are saying that there ought to be a difference between the parties?
What a novel idea! :-)
> Of course it's good to see independant
> candidates. I wonder how many of those centrist politicians out there would be
> attracted to a strong Libertarian party?
It's a chicken or egg problem, I suspect. And the dirty politics internal to
the LP don't help matters either.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
| (...) Our paper had an editorial yesterday which lambasted Jeffers for doing this. The author felt that it was important for the Rebublican party to have liberals and the Democratic party to have conservatives, to the point that independants weaken (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![A Jeffers factoid or two -Larry Pieniazek (26-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Larry Pieniazek (26-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Frank Filz (26-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Frank Filz (28-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Larry Pieniazek (29-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Scott Arthur (29-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Maggie Cambron (29-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Dave Schuler (29-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Jeffers factoid or two -Maggie Cambron (29-May-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|