To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10572
10571  |  10573
Subject: 
Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 26 May 2001 17:37:13 GMT
Viewed: 
128 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
This is the

That should read "This is the most for any state, absolutely or
proportionately". Sorry!

Our paper had an editorial yesterday which lambasted Jeffers for doing this.
The author felt that it was important for the Rebublican party to have
liberals and the Democratic party to have conservatives, to the point that
independants weaken the parties. Of course it's good to see independant
candidates. I wonder how many of those centrist politicians out there would be
attracted to a strong Libertarian party?

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
 
(...) They are saying that there ought to be a difference between the parties? What a novel idea! :-) (...) It's a chicken or egg problem, I suspect. And the dirty politics internal to the LP don't help matters either. (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
 
(...) That should read "This is the most for any state, absolutely or proportionately". Sorry! ++Lar (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR