Subject:
|
Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 May 2001 14:43:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
886 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > This is the
> > >
> > > That should read "This is the most for any state, absolutely or
> > > proportionately". Sorry!
> >
> > Our paper had an editorial yesterday which lambasted Jeffers for doing this.
> > The author felt that it was important for the Rebublican party to have
> > liberals and the Democratic party to have conservatives, to the point that
> > independants weaken the parties.
>
> They are saying that there ought to be a difference between the parties?
> What a novel idea! :-)
No, the impression I got was that the author preferred the Demopublican
Party.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
| (...) Sigh. Sorry for reading that too quickly the first time and getting all excited over nothing... Ho hum, more of the same. I think there should be only two car companies, GM and Ford, and that they ought to share all their engineering and (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
| (...) They are saying that there ought to be a difference between the parties? What a novel idea! :-) (...) It's a chicken or egg problem, I suspect. And the dirty politics internal to the LP don't help matters either. (25 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
