 | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
(...) You're aware, I trust, that the President can pardon whomever he (or, when the time comes, she) chooses, right? Perhaps we might ask why Bush pardoned Weinberger or why Ford pardoned Nixon. Obviously the Rich pardon was performed in a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
(...) Perhaps he's referring to this: (URL) wait, my mistake--that article identifies the greenhouse effect as real. And before anyone gripes about the Clinton News Network pushing a pointy-headed liberal agenda, the study appears in the scientific (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
I forgot a couple things, sorry. :^P (...) Many of the old power generators are driven by diesel engines. Coal engines, too. (...) Found this a few minutes ago. (URL) Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
(...) I can't believe you think his concerns are noble. His concern is for all those big factories that are going to line his pockets (or donate to his next campaign, or whatever) when he allows them to spew carbon dioxide in copious amounts. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
(...) Betch ol' "W" will be helpin' promote his homeland's other interest, should Mad Cow threaten his other buddies. Here's a new slogan for "W": "Beef and Oil, goes together like Dorothy and the Wicked Witch. Home cooking, like mama used to make." (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
|
(...) Hail, Grand Admiral, Sir! Sgt. Farkas requests permission to speak freely, Sir. I read the story and didn't see anything about oil. Also, you can't discount his (W's) stated concern about energy prices, especially living on the west coast. And (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Apology
|
|
(...) This whole incident reminds me that we should all be understanding that the written word is sometimes hard to interpret correctly. One thing I was immediately curious, noticing that Mladen is posting from a Canadian e-mail address is if he is (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Apology
|
|
Rec'vd and duely noted, I must say for All to know, Mladen sent me a private e-mail apologizing for misdeeds done, I encouraged him not to fret and that I too was a little at fault, However, and more importantly, I would ask all the fellow LUGNETers (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WOW ~ #1593 Classic Space ~ WOW!!!...!!!
|
|
Hey, I was just a little disturbed because I posted first about a good sale, but my thread was so small compared with the second person who posted the same sale. Kind of stupid but what the heck. When I read this new thread that was basically (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | An Apology
|
|
As lame as it sounds giving an apology after several people have already told me that I am rude, mean, and possibly evil person, I am still going to try to repent my evil deeds. To whom it may concern, I, Mladen Pejic, apologize to Eric Sophie and (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
(...) It does. Thanks! ++Lar (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
Excellent, I'll take that as a compliment! (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
True, True, throwing in a half described compliment, dosen't always come off as intended. I did send a reply stating that a separete posting singing praises was in order. Thanks for being impartial. I'll be more specific in future postings! (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: kudos to eric
|
|
Hey thanks, gotta try to maintain what we got right?, so if we ask, mayby we will forgive, I was a little shocked by the reply, I just can't see a good builder on the outs, but, we share a passion, I guess we are not all built the same - ha! pun (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
(...) I read it "In My Experience" HTH. eric (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | kudos to eric
|
|
cool kudos to eric for being such a good guy about all this, this is the kind of post that certainly catches my eye. howD eric thx for coming -paul (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
Thank you , that's exacly what I Intended!! (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
Whoa, take it easy, I only wanted to add a bit of respect thru a small comment. The Words "big mech-y creations" was ill chosen, he does have a few that are about two feet tall or so, so "medium" mayby a more apt description. -nano fig or not. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
(...) Your point is well taken. (although it was Eric's comment that Mladen responded to) However even a braggart has to learn to let perceived slights to his or her skill just pass on by without a response. In fact if you really WANT to be a good (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
|
|
(...) No, just tip the bottle (back) and enjoy. But don't tip it over, we don't need any whine spillage. FUT .pun ++Lar (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
