 | | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I don't think that TLC legal has stated that they know about his site, but I think people have mentioned being pointed to the site as a source for old instructions no longer available from Consumer Affairs. I'd also find it hard to believe (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) They've been well aware of it for at least 26 months. I don't think they would suddenly ask that it be shut down, unless they began offering something equivalent themselves. --Todd [followups to .publish] (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Wouldn't surprise me. Of course, unless there is regulation which specifically states that not enforcing one's copyright would not at all affect the ability to recover damages, the longer one leaves a violator alone, the less likely you will (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Has TLC stated that they know about Kevin's site? It's very possible that this was discussed previously and I simply missed it. If they haven't made such a statement, though, how would Kevin go about demonstrating that TLC *did* know about his (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) IANAL, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that there was some kind of time span of 3 years that figured in somewhere, something to the effect that if someone _knew_ you were violating their copyright for three years and didn't do (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Yes. Not doing so is stealing. (...) Nope. All that does is identify who the copyright owner is. These days, such a notice is not required to assert copyright ownership. (...) Well, I think people may have tried to ask. They are being put on (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | We have too many cats in our house already
|
|
(...) Here's what I said, we shall see what I get back: begin quote: Your ULA on your site says that you have loaned me the hardware that Forbes sent me. I've decided that if I cannot use that hardware in whatever manner I see fit, I may not want (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: CueCat calls home when you scan barcodes?
|
|
(...) Whoops! Quoting from: (URL) :CueCat reader is only on loan to you from Digital:Convergence and may be recalled at any time. Without limiting the foregoing, your possession or control of the :CueCat reader does not transfer any right, title or (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: CueCat calls home when you scan barcodes?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the pointer. I'm not going to be using the software sent to me, and if I can't legally use them for anything else, may end up tossing them. That may be an overreaction, I suppose. Companies are certainly able to collect data on me (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) You're absolutely spot on. I thought what the banks lobbied to do to the NCUA was the highest degree of larceny and was relieved when it failed. Believe it or not most of my day to day non investment money is in Credit Unions, I am a big fan (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
