 | | Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
|
|
(...) defenitly not! (...) Can't think of any reason why not... (...) That's just wrong. :/ Dan (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
|
|
Ed and all, (...) I don't really have much of an opinion per say on this. Do what you want in the bedroom, I don't go in yours, don't go in mine. (...) Should the governmnet have any say in it? I think the federal tax code is a total sham, and it (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
|
|
(...) No. At least not from a civil perspective. And it is only a civil perspective that should have standing in the eyes of the law. Marriage is a contract like any other Unless the parties CHOOSE to bring a third party in (the church) it has (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
|
|
(...) Heck no! (Then again, neither should the government, either.) (...) Absolutely! (IMHO) (...) Is there any way you could contract him to do any work for you, for some sort of salary or rate, whereby he could technically be self-employed and pay (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
|
|
I'd like to hear your opinions on gay marriage/Domestic Partnerships. In America, where we have freedom of religion, should the church have any say in what constitutes a marriage? Should those in gay marriages/domestic partnerships be allowed the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Larry, I read them. While interesting reading, they suffer from everything that Scott has accused me of: name calling, lack of evidence, etc. The Mastery of the Big Lie was interesting in that it is an idea developed by Roger Ailes for the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea set ...
|
|
[ FUT lugnet.general ] Gary: (...) I would definitely go for mixed colours. (...) Not a bad choice. For a different building challenge take <set:6580> minus the two tail fins (and two more pieces to reach 100). I can say many evil things about that (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) They're in this thread tree somewhere but I'll repeat them. (URL) shows a general view of agenda-ism... (nice coinage James) (URL) shows what poltroons the Clintonistas are. (URL) shows the mastery of the Big Lie. ++Lar (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Larry, The only links you gave in the "Wench" discussion were for the "Nazi" law and the campus orientation. I read the Godwin? Law re: the longer the thread the probablity of Nazi/Hilter =1. The campus orientation article didn't bother me (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
Larry, (...) Wel, I am honored, but I am hardly a poster child of the Christian RIght. I get into it too much with my pastor's wife for that! :) Scott S. P.S. Rudy did do some wrong things, from what I read (The juvenille record is pretty stupid), (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
