To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *5131 (-10)
  Re: An idea set ...
 
(...) OK, here's my take on this.... Remember those architectural wooden blocks that sometimes serve this purpose, well use LEGO instead of blocks. Here's what I would use (sort of a Greek/Roman Temple effect) All white bricks...... (36) 2x2 round (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) Rudy, (...) Nothing amusing about Waco, or bombing a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan on the day of impeachment, or vowing to save the Kosovars or any of the rest of it. And not much amusing about destroying our health care delivery system (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
Ed, Well, I did happen to read the articles, BTW. (...) I did read them, thank you, and I still say, if Rudy did something wrong, have it investigated. Which I have said before about Trafficant, etc. (...) Well, your statements like "Rudy's reign of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: HUGE NEWS FOR THE WRESTLING WORLD
 
(...) I've got to agree with you. WheelChairWrestling is for old fogies; but they have two things going for them: 1. There's another place for a wrestler to get a start before he jumps to WWF. 2. If gives me something to do for an hour before Raw (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) Larry, Forget the amusing diatribe, I'm much more interested in your opinion of Rudy G. Did you read any of the linked articles? (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) at (...) did (...) defame (...) From the comments above, you clearly could not have bothered reading the news articles involving the incident and Rudy's defamation of the victim. Faulty logic on my part? Your first statement is a prime example (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) Which one's which again? I get confused so easily. Police Brutality? Remember Waco. 'nuff said. Murder Coverup? What ever did happen to Vince Foster, anyway? HRC was so busy getting her hands on FBI files that we never did get a good (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Ad hominem attacks
 
(...) Liberal, conservative, democrat, republican: They are all politicians. Can't trust one of 'em! :-) I'd credit Kennnedy for the cold war victory, by the way, not Ronny. The extremely short form: Kennedy makes Kruschev look bad over cuban missle (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
Ed, (...) Boy, was Rudy the one who fired the gun? Because you are linking him directly with police officers, so the police officers are not responsible? I guess you liked New York a lot better when it was a scumpit, filled with crime and sleaze. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
 
(...) First, I'm not a Hillary fan. But given the choice between Hillary and Rudy, I'm going for Hillary. Because of the two evils, I'll take the one who is playing money games over the one who plays police brutality/murder cover-up games. If you (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR