|
|
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) No, Guillani serves only himself and his ego, not his voting constituent. (...) one (...) And you didn't burn your LP card!!! :') (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Yes, your reading is fishy. From the article: "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the Internal (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) to (...) aquittal, (...) Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) It's not real here either. It's not real anywhere. However some newsgroup denizens do tend to view using hitler in an argument as a sign of weak rhetoric. That's been extended, in characteristic internet style, to be the joke of as soon as you (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) agree, although who can say for sure what the facts are...) "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Larry, (...) Really? I remember I got flagged by it once, by you Larry, so is it real here as well? (...) Indeed. (...) The LP party was the one who nominated Stern? Wow. That is interesting. I remember he was running for something, but I don't (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) It's not a real rule. Just a running joke. See: (URL) a "low bandwidth suitable" version of the jargon file) or (URL) original... same content, different presentation) If you want to call Guliani a Nazi that's fine by me. But I think NY would (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) from "TRAFICANT TOOK DONATION FROM WIFE OF INDICTED MOB FIGURE", or Gorgano Landscaping Company. Whether or not this company is dealing with the mob or not, it is still a legal contribution, unless I am reading something wrong here. As for (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed "Boxer" Jones <edboxer@aol.com> wrote in message news:Fru7GM.1s7@lugnet.com... (...) frequently (...) hate (...) comments? (...) ages. (...) In (...) "wench" to (...) mayor (...) last (...) Would you care to back up your "skyrocketed" claim with (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: Proof would be (...) (URL) with these (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Good idea. And remember to take those mental pills. One is prone to talk to oneself if one forgets one's medication. -Shiri FUT o-t.fun (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Wow, "goes in waves" is right!!!
|
| Frank, Ugh, let's not debate at all, outside of a few rants and raves. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wow, "goes in waves" is right!!!
|
| (...) Gee, can we go back to the religion debate? That seemed much more of a valuable debate than the current ones... (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Right. A new rule for myself: If I feel compelled to drink a Diet Coke, a Fresca, and 7 cups of coffee at work, I should not/cannot/will not allow myself to post messages until I have de-toxed. (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Make up your mind and get back to us, why don'tcha? :-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Ok. My bad. Last time. Change that back to "wouldn't." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) err..typo: make that "would." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) I'd say that calling anyone a nazi is pretty strong language that should be used with care and restraint. By calling someone a nazi, you are accusing them of possessing the same moral character as a group that practiced the worst systematic (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) Well, Ed, since i don't know the particulars on this one, why don't you inform us of it? I do remember something along the lines of congress people now being under the same laws oas we, the citizens, are. If he did not pay his taxes, he (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Some find me very interesting, thank you. (...) man (...) him (...) and (...) How do you iron a sure? :') Qualifications: One would definitely be that you have to pay your taxes. (...) James happens to be one of the few Democrats that (...) Of (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
