|
|
 | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (snip) (...) um...shouldn't that be "principles"? Terry, I challenge you to do a show, and tell every one of the children viewing your display "its f---ing cool!" That's using it in everyday language, right? I wonder how many parents will be leaving (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) (I'm breaking my own self-imposed rule about posting here, so I will deal with me later;-) I have a question I'd like to ask you that in my mind relates to this topic, Dave! Which is more precious: life or freedom? JOHN (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) No way, you've got to be kidding me. Now I know how we massage a budget here in our little sewer district to show numbers we want, so I can imagine a criminal institution can show how it costs $1/day to support a convict. Sorry, I don't buy (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) George Carlin - now there's a man that can swear. (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Hello Mark: Since your post hasn’t yet been answered, I’ll take a stab at it. You’ve already raised some good objections yourself, upon which I’ll elaborate. You ask what would constitute a satisfactory deterrent/punishment for the planned (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) (URL) I should caution that the place-of-birth listed in that second reference might strike some readers as borderline profanity...) Dave! (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Sorry, I just couldn't resist jumping in, being the nitpicker that I am, in the good spirits that I'm in right now. 1) That was not a pun, just a (IMO) joke so obvious that it was pretty pointless making it in the first place. 2) I think you (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Bye, bye Canada
|
| (...) Do you speak French? If not, I guess you don't speak to the vast majority of people here that speak French as their natural language, that have no idea that there is a Canadian culture (most people here wouldn't know that Avril Lavigne, Bryan (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) James, haven't you got the slightest idea of what you're talking about? I'm no more Canadian at heart that you are, I don't know, Martian. So even if all the official papers say that I'm whatever you want, I'm what I want, nothing more, (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Meh. Comments like that come from an education man I guess???... I was implying "about Lar". Stop talking about that person, not at all. I'm surprised a superior being like you couldn't understand that. (...) Woh... So by saying the "F" word, (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Here's the thing for me-- iwork for a Canadian company that has locations throughout Canada (except the Territories--I'd love that, but not so much at this time with the trips to the Yukon...) Anyway, we have 6 or so locatoins in the province (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) I expect that you meant "an uneducated man," but it would be churlish of me to make an issue of a typo when I myself am endlessly guilty of same. However, it's a mistake to identify the dreaded "f" word as an indicator of a lack of education (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Lets see: Passport=Canadian Money=Canadian Last Referendum= Canadian Therefore, you are Canadian. You may be a Quebeccois, and I might be a Smurfing Squarehead (Insert apropriate swearword that started this whole thing instead of Smurfing if (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Then why didn't you? Would have been a good idea... (...) The "f" word is uncalled for, it is last resort of a man without ideas, foundations, positions, or principals. It is the tool of an uneducation man. I know Chris personally and he is a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Now you're teasing me... You know pretty well that I'm no Canadian... I'm Québécois and not part of your country, which is a fine country i might add, at all. --'Put up or shut (...) I'm not even talking about his Admin job... I'm talking (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Query: What in your opinion (not necessarily Dave but YOU the reader) is a satisfactory deterent/punishment for the planned killing of another human? (I'm not talking about drunk drivers or rage induced killings. I mean the serial killer or (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Excellent news!
|
| The Supreme Court (URL) has moved our nation> one step forward toward the abandonment of a barbaric practice! Way to go, Supremes! Not much to debate, I guess, except that the practice should be banned altogether. All in good time. Dave! (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
| (...) We can always use a good laugh. :-) (...) It's amusing that a religion founded on the principle that the King of England can divorce (or behead) his wife gets antsy about Prince Chucky's antics. (see "We can always use a good laugh" above) (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Especially since this issue may have hooks into the Novak/Valerie CIA agent outing issue a long time ago--outing a CIA spook is still treasonable, and, as yet, no resolution in sight. Yoe, if this happened under Bubba's tenure, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
| //sarcasm on// Can someone point me to all of the articles on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC about the Jeff Gannon scandal? //sarcasm off// If a similar story had arisen during Clinton's administration, we'd have heard nothing else for the entire (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
