To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26624
26623  |  26625
Subject: 
Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 03:19:49 GMT
Viewed: 
869 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Bellis wrote:

This raises several questions:

Q1. People from the rest of the world seem to like our Queen, and as such she is
an asset for UK tourism.  However, do they really care whether Prince Charles
will succeed her?

We can always use a good laugh.  :-)


Q2. Is it the duty of the monarch (or for that matter President!) to give a
moral lead to the nation, or should they reflect the state of the nation?

It's amusing that a religion founded on the principle that the King of England
can divorce (or behead) his wife gets antsy about Prince Chucky's antics.  (see
"We can always use a good laugh" above)


Q3. If the answer to Q2 is to give a moral lead, is the breakdown of Prince
Charles' marriage and his unfaithfulness to Diana indicative of his level of
commitment to the country, and should he therefore abdicate on moral grounds?

How the heck are tabloids gonna drum up sales if Charles can't fool around?



Q4, If not on moral grounds then should he follow Edward VIII in the 1930s, who
abdicated because the constitution said that he could not otherwise marry Wallis
Simpson, also a divorcee?

My personal bet is that Chucky will get away with it because Camilla is at least
a brit, rather than some common American like Simpson.


Q5. Is the excuse of potentially calling Camilla "Princess Consort" rather than
"Queen" sufficient to permit Charles to take the throne?

I doubt it matters - I suspect his mother has every intention of remaining Queen
until she is 100.  She'll probably outlive him (just to spite him, at the very
least).


Q6. Given Charles' record, should he abdicate on the grounds that he could not
fulfil the role of "Supreme head of the Church of England" (the Anglican church
in the UK), which requires the person to give a moral lead to the nation?

Wellllll, he is giving a moral lead, just not a lead that religious
conservatives agree with.  ;-)

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Should Prince Charles abdicate?
 
In the UK, Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, has recently announced that he will marry Camilla Parker-Bowles. This follows his divorce from Princess Diana and hers from her husband. They were seeing each other before either of them got (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

6 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR