To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26624
26623  |  26625
Subject: 
Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 03:19:49 GMT
Viewed: 
4859 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Bellis wrote:

> This raises several questions:
> 
> Q1. People from the rest of the world seem to like our Queen, and as such she is
> an asset for UK tourism.  However, do they really care whether Prince Charles
> will succeed her?

We can always use a good laugh.  :-)

> 
> Q2. Is it the duty of the monarch (or for that matter President!) to give a
> moral lead to the nation, or should they reflect the state of the nation?

It's amusing that a religion founded on the principle that the King of England
can divorce (or behead) his wife gets antsy about Prince Chucky's antics.  (see
"We can always use a good laugh" above)

> 
> Q3. If the answer to Q2 is to give a moral lead, is the breakdown of Prince
> Charles' marriage and his unfaithfulness to Diana indicative of his level of
> commitment to the country, and should he therefore abdicate on moral grounds?

How the heck are tabloids gonna drum up sales if Charles can't fool around?


> 
> Q4, If not on moral grounds then should he follow Edward VIII in the 1930s, who
> abdicated because the constitution said that he could not otherwise marry Wallis
> Simpson, also a divorcee?

My personal bet is that Chucky will get away with it because Camilla is at least
a brit, rather than some common American like Simpson.

> 
> Q5. Is the excuse of potentially calling Camilla "Princess Consort" rather than
> "Queen" sufficient to permit Charles to take the throne?

I doubt it matters - I suspect his mother has every intention of remaining Queen
until she is 100.  She'll probably outlive him (just to spite him, at the very
least).

> 
> Q6. Given Charles' record, should he abdicate on the grounds that he could not
> fulfil the role of "Supreme head of the Church of England" (the Anglican church
> in the UK), which requires the person to give a moral lead to the nation?

Wellllll, he is giving a moral lead, just not a lead that religious
conservatives agree with.  ;-)

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Should Prince Charles abdicate?
 
In the UK, Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, has recently announced that he will marry Camilla Parker-Bowles. This follows his divorce from Princess Diana and hers from her husband. They were seeing each other before either of them got (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

6 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR