 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) Here's the thing for me-- iwork for a Canadian company that has locations throughout Canada (except the Territories--I'd love that, but not so much at this time with the trips to the Yukon...) Anyway, we have 6 or so locatoins in the province (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I love LUGNET
|
|
(...) I expect that you meant "an uneducated man," but it would be churlish of me to make an issue of a typo when I myself am endlessly guilty of same. However, it's a mistake to identify the dreaded "f" word as an indicator of a lack of education (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) Lets see: Passport=Canadian Money=Canadian Last Referendum= Canadian Therefore, you are Canadian. You may be a Quebeccois, and I might be a Smurfing Squarehead (Insert apropriate swearword that started this whole thing instead of Smurfing if (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | I love LUGNET
|
|
(...) Then why didn't you? Would have been a good idea... (...) The "f" word is uncalled for, it is last resort of a man without ideas, foundations, positions, or principals. It is the tool of an uneducation man. I know Chris personally and he is a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) Now you're teasing me... You know pretty well that I'm no Canadian... I'm Québécois and not part of your country, which is a fine country i might add, at all. --'Put up or shut (...) I'm not even talking about his Admin job... I'm talking (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
|
(...) Query: What in your opinion (not necessarily Dave but YOU the reader) is a satisfactory deterent/punishment for the planned killing of another human? (I'm not talking about drunk drivers or rage induced killings. I mean the serial killer or (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Excellent news!
|
|
The Supreme Court (URL) has moved our nation> one step forward toward the abandonment of a barbaric practice! Way to go, Supremes! Not much to debate, I guess, except that the practice should be banned altogether. All in good time. Dave! (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
(...) We can always use a good laugh. :-) (...) It's amusing that a religion founded on the principle that the King of England can divorce (or behead) his wife gets antsy about Prince Chucky's antics. (see "We can always use a good laugh" above) (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Especially since this issue may have hooks into the Novak/Valerie CIA agent outing issue a long time ago--outing a CIA spook is still treasonable, and, as yet, no resolution in sight. Yoe, if this happened under Bubba's tenure, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
|
//sarcasm on// Can someone point me to all of the articles on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC about the Jeff Gannon scandal? //sarcasm off// If a similar story had arisen during Clinton's administration, we'd have heard nothing else for the entire (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
Snip (...) remarriage after divorce! Tim (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
(...) Indeed there is - (URL) Posh Spice> has just had a baby! Scott A (who hates the growing vacuous celebrity culture) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
(...) Speak for yourself mate! ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics from ToyFair 2005
|
|
(...) cost? The ideals of the past gave relevance to the notions that Military (guns) and Mortality (graves) were not the ethics the company was founded upon… What compromise is this? ...unfortunately, it’s a realistic one! But the new gun-heavy (...) (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.year.2005, lugnet.general, lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Interview and interrogation, and who cares anyway? (Australia)
|
|
Twelve months ago, our federal political leaders told us that no Australians were involved in the interrogation of Iraqi detainees. Now it turns out that Australians were involved in 'interviews', but not 'interrogations'. Interviews can be clearly (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Bellis wrote about prospective King Chuck. As one of the Queen's subjects, I probably ought to take this all more seriously but: (...) Yes people (and I) do care some. This is why there are currently record numbers (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
|
In the UK, Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, has recently announced that he will marry Camilla Parker-Bowles. This follows his divorce from Princess Diana and hers from her husband. They were seeing each other before either of them got (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This Week's "Dumbest Thing I've Ever Heard"
|
|
(...) I find it amusing that every word of that post is still true nearly a year later. But I have to wonder: has any critical portion of the vaunted Missile Defense Shield ever not failed? I read (URL) this> article, and it sounds like more of the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barber Shop (Thread Hijack))
|
|
(...) <snip> Depends on the level of 'dirtiness'--maybe I'll go check myself in at the nearest rehab centre... It's free, y'know--my socialist country pays for such things... (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Another assault on the UN dashed on the beaches
|
|
I heard the R4 show Moniot refers to... it was quite scary: "The BBC's File On 4 programme has learnt that out of over $20bn raised in oil revenues during US-led rule, the use of $8.8bn is unaccounted for."...(URL) more>>>> Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
