 | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
|
(...) If we follow the logic that marriage is a legal two-party contract - then union of woman and horse is disallowed because horses can't engage in legal contracts. Neither can dogs, turtles, mice, or chimpanzees. If this groups of animals were to (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
|
(...) OK, I was totally wrong. The US pretends that dual citizenship doesn't exist. It's neither expressly forbidden nor permitted. Some nations, like Germany expressly forbid it. Dual citizens primarily risk losing their citizenship by (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | polygyny in "biblical times"
|
|
(...) This is very OT (excuse the pun); for a NT ref see Matthew 25:1-12: "...the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom...." ;) (...) (I think you mean polygyny). It was (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nike sued over a stick-man drawing?
|
|
(...) The image link didn't work right because it was in FTX (gotta watch out for those underscores). It should work right in this post, though. (...) Do you mean the xiaoxiao movies? I agree that they're amusing (and by "they", I mean #3+, since (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nike sued over a stick-man drawing?
|
|
"Purple Dave" schreef in bericht news:I0z7EJ.1FDM@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) 0716/aponbige/chinanikesued1 (...) In search for the nike commercial I find this (URL) I find that funny. :-) I have seen the commercial and I think the guy has a point. The (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
|
(...) "Activist judge" = "Hitler"? This is big, Dave! I think you are underestimating the arguments against legislating from the bench. I'm curious-- how would you respond to an act of congress that went something like this: "The courts are not to (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET might be in trouble with the Induce act
|
|
(...) Thanks for bringing this up. Scary stuff! As for the act itself, it seems it is brought to us by some of my LEAST favorite senators: Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. FRIST, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina, and Mrs. BOXER) (20 years ago, 17-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Nike sued over a stick-man drawing?
|
|
You know, I used to think the US had cornered the market on stupid lawsuits, but (URL) is just too funny. (20 years ago, 17-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Dubya's Resume
|
|
(...) the advent of television." Not sure if that's such a bad thing when you speak as well as Shrub. ROSCO (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | ITV Bias-O-Meter
|
|
(URL) got me thinking. (URL) TV> is a slow (non?) starter. Wouldn't it be fun if all the news channels had interactive Bias-O-Meters where the viewers got to rate the shows on the fly to see where they fit in on the lefty to righty scale? That's (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The funniest thing I've seen in months
|
|
(...) Well, um, I mean, uh... We're just talking hypothetically, right? None of us would ever dream of truly circumventing a protection of this sort? (...) Actually, I know people who know everything. I'm just the medium, like the pipe that carries (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The funniest thing I've seen in months
|
|
(...) I could be a big less vague here, but the DMCA makes me nervous, discussing how to circumvent a web redirect embedded in a blob of flash content. You know everything Dave, remind me who's responsible for that piece of garbage legislation so I (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The funniest thing I've seen in months
|
|
(...) Hadn't even thought of that. Can I just yank the file out of my Temporary Internet folder, or do I need to use the cookie to play it on a non-Internet-linked flashplayer? FUT: OT-Geek Dave! (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The funniest thing I've seen in months
|
|
(...) Hey, thanks for the mirror site. It's almost impossible to get through to the original at jibjab. Better yet, view source on the html of your mirror site reveals the secret cookie required to run a local copy of the swf file. Cool. Don (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The funniest thing I've seen in months
|
|
(URL) Maybe rated PG for language.> Savvy viewers may lament the exclusion of any third-party japes, but there's a wonderful swipe at Dean and a funny Kubrick moment for Bush. (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dubya's Resume
|
|
(URL) saw this and figured the gang on OTD might get a kick out of it.) Adr. (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | LUGNET might be in trouble with the Induce act
|
|
(URL) guy posts about technilogies that might be effectivly outlawed if the stupid "Induce" act passes. Today's entry was LEGO. Since LEGO provides the mosaiac maker, and encourages people to upload scans of pictures they might not own the copyright (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Metru Nui Goes Political
|
|
(...) When the "story bible" was reportedly developed (2000, when Bush's administration was largely hobbled by the whole Florida vote stigma), the whole Soviet era was considered a fairly safe topic. We'd beaten them in the Cold War and seen them (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Metru Nui Goes Political
|
|
(...) Obviously, LEGO is too politically correct (and marketing savvy) to openly criticize American political policies. In fact, pushing a Soviet-style marketing campaign is probably cutting-edge daring for them. But that doesn't mean such (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
|
(...) Let's establish henceforth that any time a debater uses "activist judges" as a means to trump an argument, then the debater has forfeited the argument. The Left has *not* forced the issue. One state's judiciary has rightly identified the laws (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
