Debate : 24856


Off-Topic / Debate / 24856	24855 \| 24857

Subject:	Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:38:26 GMT
Viewed:	1473 times

sisters and horses, etc?

If we follow the logic that marriage is a legal two-party contract - then union of woman and horse is disallowed because horses can’t engage in legal contracts. Neither can dogs, turtles, mice, or chimpanzees. If this groups of animals were to be granted legal status first, then and only then would the possibility of them entering into legal marriage union be possible.

There is only one animal with the legal standing to get married, and it is such a dumb and stupid animal, I don’t really see why anyone would want to.

-Lenny

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) This is exactly my point-- by what reasoning do you choose to define marriage soley between 2 parties? On what basis do you make this discrimination? I have chosen to define it as 1 man and 1 woman. You choose "two-party". Someone else might (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) "Activist judge" = "Hitler"? This is big, Dave! I think you are underestimating the arguments against legislating from the bench. I'm curious-- how would you respond to an act of congress that went something like this: "The courts are not to (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search