Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET might be in trouble with the Induce act
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Jul 2004 05:13:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
685 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dan Boger wrote:
> http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/005028.html
>
> This guy posts about technilogies that might be effectivly outlawed if the
> stupid "Induce" act passes. Today's entry was LEGO.
>
> Since LEGO provides the mosaiac maker, and encourages people to upload scans of
> pictures they might not own the copyright to, it could be said that LEGO is
> inducing people to break the law.
>
> The post even mention's LUGNET's mosaic maker, which by the same logic, could
> land LUGNET in hot legal water?
>
> The only funny thing about the post is that the first comment corrected him to
> say LEGO and not LEGOS.
Thanks for bringing this up. Scary stuff!
As for the act itself, it seems it is brought to us by some of my LEAST favorite
senators:
Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. FRIST, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. GRAHAM
of South Carolina, and Mrs. BOXER)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | LUGNET might be in trouble with the Induce act
|
| (URL) guy posts about technilogies that might be effectivly outlawed if the stupid "Induce" act passes. Today's entry was LEGO. Since LEGO provides the mosaiac maker, and encourages people to upload scans of pictures they might not own the copyright (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
