 | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
|
(...) Nice. Burgler != killer. So the 'kill or be killed' application does not apply. Sure you don't know the intention of said burgler, but because he broke one law doesn't immediately mean he 's going to commit murder. If we justified killing (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Let me see if I understand...
|
|
Following the big-corporate push for deregulation (ie sanctioned monopolization) of the media, which was, of course, approved along party lines despite an unprecedented flood of public opposition, the FCC voted to raise the limits imposed on (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
|
(...) Right so even that article said the "16-year-old kid" broke into his home. If your old enough to commit the crime your old enough get shot for it. I for one would not let someone survive breaking into my home regardless of which direction (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Corporate Responsibility
|
|
Corporations get extraordinary benefits from being fictitious persons here in the states. My problem is that I don't see corporations holding up their end of the bargain... Corporate Tax Cheats Wreak Havoc On The Neediest Among Us (URL) All across (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
|
|
(...) Blair is the British PM... not the English. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
|
(...) The reality is that Mr Martin shot a 16-year-old kid in the back from a range of four feet using a weapon he should not have had. Read on: (URL) Mr Martin was tried using standards which put certain aspects of your legal system to shame. Why (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
|
(...) What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”? BTW: How hypocritical will it be if (as has been suggested) Rumsfeld publishes pictures of their bodies? Scott A (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
|
(...) Y'know, I cannot recall a single instance before the administration of Shrub where the idea of detaining people in contravention of the most basic of all of our supposedly protected civil rights AND the idea of torturing them was part of every (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ne or Ni [monty python]
|
|
(...) Sorry to bring up an old thread (dons flame-resistant suit), but I've always thought it was 'ni.' But maybe that's just mi. I'd think 'nee' would be said 'nay.' At least in some countries. ekki ekki f'tang zwoop-boing bbmmbrwow ni -Tim (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
|
(...) So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent? (...) Your comparison is, if not completely laughable, not analogous. (...) Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision! I read a quotation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
