 | | Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
|
|
(...) Say again? If you cheat on your wife, no matter how often, then you are a disgusting pig. JOHN (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
|
|
(...) What planet are you from? When I am lucky I commit these "transgressions" on a nightly basis. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Michael Moore gets money from Disney
|
|
(...) Jeez! Dr. Laura is disliked not because of her religious or political views, but because she is a bigot and spreads a message of hatred against gays, bisexuals, and those involved in BDSM. Her attacks on people participating in alternative (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
|
|
(...) You may be missing the subtle insinuation here. To many liberals JFK was the be all of what a president should be. Many would love for Clinton to be the second coming of Kennedy and do all they can to resurrect his legacy. As Clinton will (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
|
|
"Author says JFK had affair with 19-year- old intern" (URL) had no skills. She could answer the phone," Robert Dallek, author of "An Unfinished Life," told "Dateline NBC" in an interview that aired Sunday. "Apparently, her only skill was to provide (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Michael Moore gets money from Disney
|
|
(...) While that is a great quote, and very true, I am not so sure that it completely applies here. I believe that Disney’s decision is directly related to the ideology of Michael Eisner and those in his inner circle. I just wait to see if there is (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Michael Moore gets money from Disney
|
|
Well, I don't go to the movies to decide issues of consequence -- occasionally a film makes a relevant point, but not too often. I have also never read a MM book or seen any of his movies, so I have no real opinion of him besides what I am able to (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Michael Moore gets money from Disney
|
|
... a great MM quote: "One of the wonderful flaws of capitalists is that they will actually help me produce something against their interests, if they can make a dime out of it." Scott A (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Michael Moore gets money from Disney
|
|
Granted I believe this is a good relationship as much of Michael Moore’s works belong in fantasyland, but why would Michael Eisner and Disney make such a move? Michael Moore is at best a film maker of questionable integrity and at worst partisan (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | " the need for a UN-led process to establish a legitimate Iraqi government"
|
|
Short stayed as long as she could: Clare Short quits post over Iraq (URL) position the UK's adopting in the Security Council is totally dishonourable and breaches the promises that the UN would have the proper role in bringing into being a (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Choke Hold, The Fear
|
|
(...) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | great front page [Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK]
|
|
(...) this misjudgement by Sharon: Gaza visitors must sign waiver in case army shoots them (URL) story I expect the child killers in the IDF will be happy to read] (...) I partly agree. But I think part of the problem is that he feels obliged to (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The two faces of Rumsfeld [Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK]
|
|
(...) Harder; but not impossible. Anyhow is the current bogeyman not a "dirty bomb"? (...) ...or the US, the country that sells "thumb cuffs" to Saudi Arabia? Really; what relevance are GPS jammers to this? [other than simple mud slinging?] You may (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Look, Ma -- No Arms, No Legs...!
|
|
“Frustrated, U.S. Arms Team to Leave Iraq: Task Force Unable To Find Any Weapons” (URL) -- The group directing all known U.S. search efforts for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is winding down operations without finding proof that President (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The Choke Hold, The Fear
|
|
"Bush Statement on Judges Demonstrates Orwellian Doublespeak: Despite 13-Year Low in Vacancies, Bush Claims Judicial Crisis" (URL) by signaling that he will work with the Senate Republican leadership to change Senate rules that have worked well for (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
|
|
Followup to yesterday: "The two faces of Rumsfeld" (URL) director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea 2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
|
|
Why should the U.S. engage in these activities in the first place? The fact that people placed highly in goverment are probably reaping some kind of on/offshore monitary benefit only makes it worse. I am also non-patisan on the issue -- Clinton (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
|
|
The agreed framework ((URL) was a bad idea when the Clinton administration put it forth, and it continued to be a bad idea all along. How bad an idea indeed, we know now, since the DPRK was apparently violating it all along. But under the terms of (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
|
|
(...) I am sorry to make you a scapegoat Scott, but this is one nit I have to pick. Irregardless is not a word, it is a double negative. What you actually mean is 'regardless' which means 'without regard to'. If 'irregardless' was a word it would (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
|
|
(...) It is pretty clear why that aid had to go then. The "man monkey" is no moron. ;) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
