|
|
 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) Yea, the only reason I dont say that anymore is cause i did when i first came here and got people upset, so, i just say 'sup'. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| (...) Cool, thats fine. You're right about lego people being intelligent, and that they are. (...) Well, im 14. And I'm not being rude here, but i dont think sup is an embarassing word. Um, it doesn't make me any less intelligent, I get A's and B's (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: For Sean...
|
| (...) Hey, tis sports my friend. (...) agg? Havn't heard that for awhile. Anyways, they all look to be close matches. (...) I'm guessing they come on ESPN early in the morning? I might wake up that early, doubt it though. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: For Sean...
|
| (...) Ottawas a good one. They played well even when they weren't being payed at all. Now thats cool. (...) Dallas Stars to be exact. Yea, that would be cool, but id love to see the Ducks vs. Wild. (...) Yep. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: For Sean...
|
| (...) YEA! (...) Good question. This surprised me just as much as the ducks...THE DUCKS, beating the red wings. Im tellin ya, its the year of the underdog. (...) I wish the capitals were still in it, a home team to go for. But no, they had to blow a (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: For Sean...
|
| (...) Yea. Well, I dunno how the Leafs could make it 7 games and then choke it 6-1. I mean, its odd. I'm cool tho, the Wild won (Imagine if it was the Wild vs. Ducks in the Finals) It's like a year of the underdogs or something. It's almost as if (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: How Will We Ever Wash the Stink of GWB Jr. Off?!
|
| (...) ...they'll be 18 soon enough. On a related note: As I understand it, the USA is one of only a handful of countries to execute juvenile offenders in the last decade. The others are: Congo, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia Nigeria and Yemen. And (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Ne or Ni [monty python]
|
| (...) Dave, you must have heard of The Knights Who Say 'Ne'? Or was it 'Ni'? ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | How Will We Ever Wash the Stink of GWB Jr. Off?!
|
| "Children held at Guantanamo Bay" (URL) younger than 16 are being held as "enemy combatants" in the American detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, the US military admitted yesterday, a practice human rights groups condemned as repugnant and illegal. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Gosh, all you people should read James Clavell's Shogun. You'll get "ne"'d to death. -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
| (...) .debate doesn't suffer fools gladly, no. If you just waltz in there and tell people you have some Good News for them, you're not likely to get a warm reception. (...) and some silliness, and you have the common sense to tell which is which, (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Must be from Anime or Manga then. Thanks for that, Mags... whew, that's all settled. (I'm gonna go with her explanation, Dave! Sorry about that, but she's smarter than you, Dave!... you're allegedly not as smart as Tim Robbins, at least (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Actually the Japanese connection makes more sense because if you make a statement and then append the "ne" it does mean "don't you agree?" or "isn't it?" But I wouldn't have associated it with the Lar "ne" because I always read that with an (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Urp! Maybe. Try not to let "brother"(1) Ashcroft know about that, OK? I'm on enough lists as it is. 1 - you used capitalization as if to imply he were a monk, I suppose. I use quotes as if to imply I'm not convinced he's the same species as (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Doh! How about the simple "ne c'est pas?" in the now-forbidden language? Dave! (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) I honestly don't know! Must be some other forum I hung out on or something. Or maybe I made it up? Who can say. I use it to mean "yes?" (as in, "do you agree?") and only at the end of sentences. Anyone recognise it? Google wasn't much help. No (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Free Speech, again
|
| (...) Most importantly, you haven't told me where "ne" came from. Very clever omission--what are you hiding? (...) I've wondered about something like that. I believe the Turing test hypothesizes that a computer convincingly able to mimic human (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
|
| (...) Uh, I meant the "royal we";-) (...) Definitely political (adversaries). (...) I wonder how the second place documentary maker looked in a swimsuit;-D JOHN (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
|
| (...) We? No. I'd be laughing with him. So, do you reckon this is coming from his political targets or his rival documentary makers? It's certainly not coming from the Academy. What would be interesting is what the 'second placed' documentary maker (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
|
| (...) He is so far removed from reality that he probably would. I believe that a normal person, having some semblance of dignity and pride, would be horrified were it to happen to them. But the fact would remain that we would be laughing *at* him, (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
