 | | Re: Factory Pictures Finally
|
|
(...) Perhaps it is the mere fact that your messages use certain words that suggest your perspective as being superior. Perhaps a lighter tone and a better use of softer words is needed in a public forum. This is a problem I struggle with all the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
|
(...) By Wrong I mean it is unconstitutional in the USA. I explained why it is wrong beyond that in my original post. -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
|
(...) What do you mean it is "wrong"? Is everynation which has gun control (I expect most do) wrong then? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
|
(...) here.) Whatever. The point was about Gun Control not God anyway. Sheesh! -Mike Petrucelli (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
|
(...) Because Gun Control is wrong. Did you read the rest of the post. (...) would (...) identical (...) owners (...) (traffic (...) contradict (...) at (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
|
|
(...) I agree with your point on parties. I decided a few years ago that I would never join a party again as it was too much of a compromise. Likewise I try not to pigeonhole myself as being assigned to any particular political ideology. That way, I (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
|
(...) Richard's statement that I was responding to refered to "No one here...", i.e. he was refering to the respondents in the collective. I replied in the collective, which Richard seems to have missed. I'm not going to reply to Richard's message (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Factory Pictures Finally
|
|
(...) I still do not see why he has to change it to siut you. its a factory to him. Josh (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve Lane
|
|
(...) I always remember who comes from the UK, CAUSE I DO TOO! I'll probably bump into him at a Legofest some day. (...) I think flat fee's are a lot more popular in the UK now than they we're. I pay a flat flee. I'm glad Scott is keeping the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Factory Pictures Finally - Explanation of Curved roof
|
|
(...) Jesse I will take your 'demand'? of yellow and black striped tiles as a suggestion, and consider it when I get around the finishing the details. Thank you for the suggestion. But as far as smokestacks go, I have been to a number of (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve Lane
|
|
(...) Wow, that burst my bubble! Here I thought he was this extraordinarily clever guy capable of sifting through incredibly long and complex threads and coming up with retorts, rejoinders, and references at lightning speed! (That would also explain (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
|
(...) It doesn't require apriori knowledge, just willingness to examine the law, and decide if it's a just law or not. (...) Defacto you are correct, in most cases this is what happens. Dejure you are wrong, common law (and case law if you can find (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
|
(...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
|
(...) <snip> Richard I totally agree with you here but would just like to point out that Bruce MIGHT be responding to Tom S. who I think is shading a bit more towards planting evidence than you. But you're doing great so don't let me stop you! :-) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve Lane
|
|
Remember, Scott is in the UK, so he probably pays by the minute, unless Amuricans, who mostly have flatfee. In that case, posting them all, then going on later to authorize via email all at once saves money for Lego. Me, I post all at once from time (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
|
(...) You mentioned a 40% increase in crimes using firearms, after the British parliament banned them. Is it not possible such increase had been bigger, instead of smaller, in the event of *no restrictions at all*? Then, you claim only law abiding (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve Lane
|
|
(...) I see now. It looked to me like you'd written 11 posts in 1 stint, but you didn't. Ste (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Factory Pictures Finally
|
|
(...) It appears to me that the computer network is experiencing some problems today. If you did not receive my post about this post, then it must have been lost in Lugnet. I have had a change of heart and believe that you should simply try to find (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
|
(...) Nope. The Founder Fathers thought they could trust the average venireman to judge both facts and law, no complicated understanding was supposed to be needed -- and if it were, perhaps it was not a very good law such that people could (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Factory Pictures Finally
|
|
(...) Jesse, All of the factories that I have worked at, with the exception of the local refinery, have NOT had smokestacks. A factory is a place of manufacturing is it not? Not all manufacturing process require a smokestack. Your tone still seems (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
