Subject:
|
Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:35:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > 1. Considering that we are talking about felonies, it's rather a large
> > > point. And yes, the constant statement is "I'm going to come out blazing no
> > > matter what the circumstances are, and I'll fake evidence and even execute
> > > people to cover my tracks if my unthinking attitude puts me into a bad
> > > situation." It is this attitude that may get you into trouble, and I'm
> > > trying to point out that you are on serious shakey grounds, legally and >morally.
> >
> > Actually, that last bit there riles me up some. Mostly because this sort of
> > started (at least on my end of it) because I did not sufficiently qualify
> > the scenarios I made up. I really never stated anything to the effect that
> > I would come out shooting irrespective of the actual situation -- that puts
> > stuff in MY mouth. Now I'm faking evidence first, and then executing
> > people? Wow! Who knew
>
> <snip>
>
> Richard I totally agree with you here but would just like to point out that
> Bruce MIGHT be responding to Tom S. who I think is shading a bit more
> towards planting evidence than you.
Richard's statement that I was responding to refered to "No one here...",
i.e. he was refering to the respondents in the collective. I replied in the
collective, which Richard seems to have missed. I'm not going to reply to
Richard's message that you quoted a small part above from because it becomes
a descent into hysteria (if you really want a response, Richard, I can give
a private one, but I warn you I'll be very blunt).
For that matter, I see little point in responding to Tom, who comes up with
the Klassic Klueless Suicide Logic Bomb of dismissing everything I have to
say because I am from K(C)alifornia - which is pretty clueless in and of
itself, but with the added note that *he* is from California. All I can do
is stand back and marvel that someone is that determined to make a fool of
himself.
I have seen an amazing parade of statements claiming I said this or that, or
challenging me on things I didn't say, or spinning scenarios that I said on
more than one occassion you had every right to go ahead and shoot, or even
that I should plant a sign telling thieves to come on in since I was unarmed
(which would be either entrapment or false advertising since I have noted on
numerous occasions that I have a variety of weapons). My favorite was the
law quote that actually backed me up almost word for word. All I said from
the beginning is simply that you do not have carte blanche to shoot
intruders. Think otherwise? Go check your state law.
Shrug. People want their macho fantasies.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
| (...) With this in mind, and in order to eliminate further confusion,I've compiled the following small (and by no means complete) list. On one or more occasions Bruce has claimed: 1) that he can freeze or boil water in his bare hands 2) that he can (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
| (...) Oops, could well be the case...! And once we get to the "Dots" phase these discussions get a lot ickier! (...) This sounds a lot like you would have nothing substantive to state...but sure, whatever you can dish out I can take. Can you handle (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
| (...) You are the showing yourself to be the King Fool then. You try to tell everyone else that DOESN'T live in California how much trouble they'll get into, forgetting that the World Does Not Revolve Around California, and laws in other states (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Go ahead, make my day!
|
| (...) <snip> Richard I totally agree with you here but would just like to point out that Bruce MIGHT be responding to Tom S. who I think is shading a bit more towards planting evidence than you. But you're doing great so don't let me stop you! :-) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
