 | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) So it's OK for you to abuse administrative privilege, as long as only one or two people are bothered by it? Especially if one of the two is a person that a significant people on LUGNET feel it's OK to bully? I just have to post here to say I (...) (20 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) No. The admins will determine if I crossed any line, and take action as necessary. (...) Firstly, that has nothing to do with the point I was making about wanting ALL admins to be "in the loop" when someone "contacts admin". And secondly, the (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) A point which is still apparently lost on you? (...) So you sent e-mail to the admins, and then in the absence of a response you assumed that you had administrative approval to alter somebody else's content? No problem. Sure. (...) Under the (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) Well, that's even worse, and should be fixed. (...) No, that's a different point entirely. (...) I don't think anyone had a problem with Dave reverting the pics, do you? (...) At least (URL) one person did>, and preferred to email the admins (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: test
|
| (...) Reply Test (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | |  | | test
|
| test (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | |  | | This is just a test
|
| (URL) Legway> (URL) NXTway> (URL) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Snipped (...) No, they are AFOLs. Just because I am geographically challenged to them, doesnt mean I didnt actually make the drive (numerous times). Snipped more... (...) Indeed. (...) Exactly (*grins*). Janey "Delusional, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) It's not shocking, just unclear. Not that it really matters, but these friends with whom you joked-- they aren't AFOLs I assume, because presumabley they are the ones with whom you are geographically challenged. Perhaps you joked with (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You are wrong. I think I would know, since I wrote that, and I was the one joking around. The whole thing started as a joke in real life, because I am geographically challenged from other "local" groups. You know, friends joking... real people (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Heckel wrote: <snip> (...) I've never posted to Brickshelf--do I have to leave LUGNET? <snip> Dave K (20 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) Nice dodge. It took about two minutes to look through your Lugnet post history. (...) This begs the question: Why post on a lego forum if not to share your lego things? (...) I'm not asking you to post every last MOC to Brickshelf, but you (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) LOL, and again you take "I think" and change it to an assertion of knowledge. ROSCO (20 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
| (...) Are you stalking me?!? Ah yes, I remember claiming to be perfect, It was a Tuesday and it was raining, not hard, it was a gentle rain... Try I do not post pictures of what I build because it is not a big motivation of mine and I currently do (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You'd know. JOHN (20 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I prefer to think of Al as a jerk with the lot. ROSCO (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) See, Al, at the end of the day, you're just a plain jerk. JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) In fact it wasn't all online. (...) It wasn't. And the FAQ doesn't say it was. It says "it started making sense to have a group that could participate online". I see no "need" in that excerpt at all. Just as there was no "need" for the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) <snip> (...) <snip> Verbose? Who, me?? Dave K -no one around here but us scarecrows... (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | |  | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, there ARE other ways-- ish-- but they're not easy! And they're not necessarily open to everyone. For instance, an admin could check on the Lugnet server to see how many times he's logged in. But it's not public information. You can (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |