To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53588 (-20)
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) I stand before your awesomeness. I yeild oh great brick master Tim. For your awesomeness is so great how can I build ye. The bricks are to small, I am afraid I can not compete. \\\...\\\ (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) --snip-- (...) If you think that Eric deserves an apology then perhaps you should apologise to him. Since you had as much to do with the original issue as I did then you owe him an apology as much as I do. Furthermore I've never argued that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) (*this is such a joke, I am just having fun in the way I transcribe the events*) Righgght! Brilliant, and upon further research one can plainly see, that another party, usual suspect, utters a complaint unto Eric Sophie's person, there by (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) Why bother? I was legally allowed to use them and given your typical behaviour I find it very unlikely you would volunteer to let me use them to poke fun at you. You can twist and turn all you like but what you did was morally wrong in my (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) I couldn't give a rats ass about DMCA, 'fair usage', 'freedom of speech' or '1st ammendment rights' or whatever people are going on about now--it's all obfuscating the actual issue. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) -Snip- (...) -snip- (...) I bow to your awesomeness. Ever think to ask for the images? That was "Outside" LUGNET, now What'd I do "On" LUGNET? Again, bowing to your awesomeness. (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) And the American Government... (URL) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Eric, The last thing you did wrong was to submit a DMCA image against me for an image the wasn't breaching your copyright. The image was legal. As I have explained to you by email it is called Fair Use for parody. That happened a few days ago (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
Tim, what was the last thing I did wrong? Refresh our memories and back up your story. Then tell me what any of this has to do with you or the Technic Side bar and Ross's actions. Since you like to molest my images, having broke the law several (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help! Help! I'm being repressed!!! Dave K (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) About 10 weeks in Australia. Not sure how long it is in Germany. Tim (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) The admins have terms???? How long do they last? Or are they like kings? If so, I certainly didn't vote for them. JOHN (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)  
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) it is, I hope it won.) I haven't gone back through all the threads to check. Hey, here may be an idea...Who can write the worst opening line for a story, and manage to use Lego bricks as a part of it? For example: "Harry and Darlene were (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 
  blah!
 
blah blah! blah! (20 years ago, 13-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: Hoping I don't have to do the whole setup thing again
 
On 2007-02-07 22:08:07 -0500, "Jim DeVona" <jim.devona@gmail.com> said: (...) Experimenting with a Usenet client. How will it work? (20 years ago, 10-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) I agree; they are repulsive. The jokes that have access to expresso machines, I mean. JOHN (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) I had tears in my eye from trying not to laugh out loud at work for that one. Dave K (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) Dave! (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) Don't be so negative; I found it very attractive. But I really liked this from the Romance category: Despite the vast differences it their ages, ethnicity, and religious upbringing, the sexual chemistry between Roberto and Heather was the most (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  I'm so sorry....
 
"As Johann looked out across the verdant Iowa River valley, and beyond to the low hills capped by the massive refrigerator manufacturing plant, he reminisced on the history of the great enterprise from its early days, when he and three other young (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR