 | | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Does that mean that XP provides an internal way to download files? How does that work? Can you show us that one line? :) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) After I left work last night I realized that my formulation of the question was really feeble, so here's some more info, if it helps. I guess it's not *really* DOS but is intead a DOS shell running on Windows XP. In my former department I used (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Dave, I'm pretty sure you can't do it without an external program. If you have FTP access to the file, you can use the command-line ftp program included with most msdos versions, otherwise you will need a non-dos program, I would recommend GNU (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Souter Farm target of hotel proposal?
|
|
(URL) case this link goes stale, apparently someone has made a proposal that Justice David Souter's(1) farm in NH be condemned under eminent domain and used to site a hotel. It's pretty clear the proposal is a protest but I found it interesting (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
Hi All: I know next to zilch about programming, even in DOS, so this question is asked in ignorance and good faith. If I'm writing a .bat program to copy a file from a known, static location on the web, is there a standard format by which the (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Isn't that special
|
|
Could it be..... (21 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
Hallo (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
This article was probably generated by a buggy news reader. (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | MEGABLOKS Site Updates
|
|
Information about the new Metal Ages Dragons line (URL) These sets appear to have a more "Eastern" fantasy vibe to them, and the new Dragon Eggs sets are also featured. Dave! (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Review of MB3601: Pieces of Eight
|
|
Review of MB3601 Pieces of Eight MSRP: $4.99 Pieces: 20 Figures 2 First, let me come clean and admit that until ten minutes ago I had no idea what the idiom “Pieces of Eight” means, but thanks to (URL) Wikipedia> you can count me officially (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | FTX demonstration
|
|
(URL) Scout>> (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: getting an account here is hard!
|
|
(...) testing....testing (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
This article was probably generated by a buggy news reader. (21 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Since I've already ceded that point, I think we can move on. Also, I don't know what I was smoking that led me to fail to distinguish between fetal and embryonic, which really is central in this context. My apologies. (...) We need to define (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) All politicians are most interested in the unthinking flock. Both sides have a flock like this that will beleive and regurgitate what ever they are told, expecially when it is what they want to hear. Niether party is any better than the other (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) As you have noted elsewhere, this consensus most certainly doesn't exist and scientific progress can most likely procede without the use of fetal stem cells. (...) This is actually a good point. I know that numerous eggs are used purely for (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
|
(...) The "liberal" side is always sour:-D JOHN (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
|
(...) Well isn't it the "liberals" who are supposed to be "down" on "big bad corps"?? from the article: "The court's decision drew a scathing dissent from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who argued the decision favors rich corporations." Hence the (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
|
(...) What's so strange about that? :-) You are correct; brutal decision! JOHN (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Supremes sing another sour note
|
|
The state can favour one (presumably well connected) private individual over another, to the point of using eminent domain to take what rightfully belongs to one person and give it to another: (URL) enough, this time it was the "liberal" side that (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
