To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27076
27075  |  27077
Subject: 
Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:24:37 GMT
Viewed: 
1023 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

   Strangely enough, this time it was the “liberal” side that was sour.

What’s so strange about that? :-)

Well isn’t it the “liberals” who are supposed to be “down” on “big bad corps”??

from the article:

“The court’s decision drew a scathing dissent from Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who argued the decision favors rich corporations.”

Hence the songs don’t fit the songsheets! ... “sour notes”.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
 
(...) The "liberal" side is always sour:-D JOHN (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
 
(...) What's so strange about that? :-) You are correct; brutal decision! JOHN (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR