Subject:
|
Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:23:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1053 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Strangely enough, this time it was the “liberal” side that was sour.
|
What’s so strange about that? :-)
You are correct; brutal decision!
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
| (...) Well isn't it the "liberals" who are supposed to be "down" on "big bad corps"?? from the article: "The court's decision drew a scathing dissent from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who argued the decision favors rich corporations." Hence the (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | The Supremes sing another sour note
|
| The state can favour one (presumably well connected) private individual over another, to the point of using eminent domain to take what rightfully belongs to one person and give it to another: (URL) enough, this time it was the "liberal" side that (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
