Subject:
|
Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:28:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1087 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Strangely enough, this time it was the “liberal” side that was sour.
|
What’s so strange about that? :-)
|
Well isn’t it the “liberals” who are supposed to be “down” on “big bad
corps”??
|
The “liberal” side is always sour:-D
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Supremes sing another sour note
|
| (...) Well isn't it the "liberals" who are supposed to be "down" on "big bad corps"?? from the article: "The court's decision drew a scathing dissent from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who argued the decision favors rich corporations." Hence the (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
