 | | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
(...) I just got mine Friday and built it, and I mostly agree with Larry's ratings (though I would actually rate playability a bit higher, it's fragile, but does hold together if you don't stress it too much). (...) I did try a Creator minifig, and (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
In lugnet.modelteam, Frank Filz writes: <rampant, wanton snippage> (...) [grin] Gimme a week. :) KMaynes (23 years ago, 3-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
(...) Yes, this is what we all seem to like. In my eyes this is at least the best set since 5571 - maybe even better! It got my 100% vote. (...) I have made some small chances to give room for the legs of a technic figure. Additionally the seat had (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
(...) Well, it took me longer than I thought it would to get pics taken and put up, and even then it's hardly a revolutionary application (although I'm putting them to *PROPER* use)[Grin&Duck].... on the other hand it's hardly a standard width, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
(...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 3451 "Sopwith Camel" 14-wide boxcar
|
|
(...) Very nice!! Good thing John Neal is more of a passenger train guy, or he'd be going nuts trying to come up with something better... The weathered look of the roof pieces is great - it really adds to the character of the boxcar. One question (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 3451 "Sopwith Camel" 14-wide boxcar
|
|
(...) Yeah, it is a tad short, I was hoping I'd get away with it, considering that the roof makes it look quite old, and most older rail cars were pretty small.. (then again it kinda looks like it's got metal sides, which would make it newer and (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
(...) Yow. Well. What else could I say to that, but Thanks very much! :) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 14 wide boxcar! (was Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel")
|
|
<various snippage> Nice work, Kev! I like:-) I have an idea for the ends of your boxcar which I plan to employ whenever I get around to it (far too many irons in the fire!). Try using this element to achieve the corrugated effect on the ends: (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 14 wide boxcar! (was Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel")
|
|
(...) <likewise> (...) current length of the car the endoskeleton reaches right to the edges of available space, and as such precludes the use of bricks pretty much anywhere. Then there's the small issue of a lack of elements, particularly more (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [Review] 3451 "Sopwith Camel"
|
|
<snip> (...) <snip>> (...) Any chance of some details of the mods? tim (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.reviews)
|
