Subject:
|
Re: Enter the LEGO(R) Design Challenge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:00:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
27937 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.mediawatch, Joseph Gonzalez wrote:
| |
i understand and accept the rules. my main point was the cheap notion of
‘let’s have a contest to gather LOTS of ideas for (relatively) free rather
than pay our on-staff designers to get creative’.
..jg
|
That’s one way to look at it, Joseph. Another way would be to acknowledge the
TLC is involving AFOLs into their design process, a gesture for which AFOLs
were screaming 10+ years ago. You may not know or remember what it was like
10-15 years ago-- TLC didn’t acknowledge AFOLs at all!
|
hi john
i definitely acknowledge that tlc has involved afols in the past (i feel
strongly it’s where ‘legends’, ‘creator theme’ and the whole ‘factory’ ideas are
from--along with other improvements). i guess i just feel like our involvement
reached a zenith a couple of years ago and it’s on the wane these days. i do
appreciate your input!
..jg
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Enter the LEGO(R) Design Challenge
|
| (...) That's one way to look at it, Joseph. Another way would be to acknowledge the TLC is involving AFOLs into their design process, a gesture for which AFOLs were screaming 10+ years ago. You may not know or remember what it was like 10-15 years (...) (14 years ago, 28-Jul-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
