 | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) As long as most of them don't move, they should drop. If you're tempted to buy a few now, don't. You'll just hold up the price drops, or possibly stop them entirely. (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.us.fl)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I've seen you advocate this, but I have to, to a certain extent, disagree. Suppose you don't buy any, the price doesn't drop, and someone else buys them all? Or worse, it drops, and someone else swoops in and buys them all. Now what do you (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I guess you just have to decide what's worth more to you and also decide if you're willing to gamble. I've waited and scored BIG and I've waited and scored nothing. I've also waited and seen them dwindle ever so slowly with NO price drop. > (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) What you speak of seems to be *very* dependent on the particular store and their philosophy of markdowns. My local WM-sc seems to be of the mind "don't clearance it until we have tried ever other way to sell it. Once we start marking down, do (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.us.fl)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | Ray Sanders wrote in message <386A232E.8C1F287E@gate.net>... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) How long did this process take? This also begs the question - how frequently does Target typically drop their prices? I have been to three Target stores in the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I don't know the answer to that, but there is a GMLTCer that might. Her hubby is a Dayton-Hudson exec. I do want to add that there is a certain digit (digging around here will tell you which, I think it's 4) which means that Target isn't going (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I don't know the answer to that, but there is a GMLTCer that might. Her hubby is a Dayton-Hudson exec. I do want to add that there is a certain digit (digging around here will tell you which, I think it's 4) which means that Target isn't going (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Julie Krenz
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Yes, it's been my experience that 4 is the number. There is actually another indication of a possible great deal. If you scan it and it comes up "clearance" or something like that, no price indicated, then it's usually real cheap. I have had (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm not a Dayton-Hudson exec, but in the last three years, the usual drop speed has been once every two weeks, on a Monday. So look on 3 or 4 January, and they may have gone down again--but they may not. (...) The digit in question is a 4. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course the counter is that occaisionally they screw up. This same Target (which Mike has said the stock people have said they "never" put any LEGO on clearance), clearanced 5978 earlier this year. They then continued to re-stock all fall at (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | (...) My best recollection is several weeks. I think they were wrangling the price twice a week or so. The current round (mentioned in .shopping yesterday) should be most interesting. They have little freed-up shelf space from xmas. There were two (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Slim Pickings at Target —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, in some cases the store management seems to figure into it. I think the biggest percentage drop I ever saw was ... lemme get the set number ... 6938 Scorpion Detector. $25 retail. About 30-40 of them on the shelf. Dropped to $20, $15, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
