Subject:
|
Re: Addresses
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:42:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@(stopspam)cclabs.missouri.edu
|
Viewed:
|
496 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus wrote:
>
> Kevin Loch wrote:
> > This is a great Idea, however what we really need is a secure system
> > of getting the recipient address to the sender. Does anyone have
> > any Ideas? I don't think anyone wants a centralized list of mailing
> > addresses to exist.
Why? I don't get the concern. I'm more concerned about my email
address than my postal address.
> I'm not so concerned about other LUGNuts, but there is the possibility of a
> public, centralized address list being exploited by an motivated
> envelope-stuffer.
For different reasons and in different ways I appreciate the idea of
having some semi-automated double blind doohicky and also just having no
system with fairly free-flowing who next policies.
> Where would the site be located? Is jambalaya.com , .org , or .net taken?
> Then there's always jambalaya.lugnet.com ...
Whois says they're all taken...except of course as a lugnet service.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Addresses
|
| I agree that it's not a critical concern for most people. The main advantage is a smooth and reliable system to avoid the redundant and inefficient "someone send me an address" posts. Of course, whenever you implement a system that holds a users (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | Re: Addresses
|
| Besides... doesn't a almost complete list already exist?? of course it's in Todd's computer :) I can see the need for some type of prg'ing to be done as far as listing address's and mailing them out for the next person.. though I don't see the need (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Addresses
|
| (...) I'm not so concerned about other LUGNuts, but there is the possibility of a public, centralized address list being exploited by an motivated envelope-stuffer. (...) Wow, that sounds keen. A little bit more work, but not too much. Where would (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
