 | | Re: General Box #5 —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | Hi all, I just got GB5 a few minutes ago (the second incarnation, right?). It was a little disappointing. It was very light (I know, I know, many of you want them lighter, but I want them heavier.) and thus had fairly small selection. I took out a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Eric Brouwer
|
| | | | | I was going to end up with #4 & #5 at the same time, so the box was to skip me, and go to Ken. He then sent it to me, and I of course sent it to you. The box should go on to Matthew. Eric (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Perhaps it's out of place to comment on contributions to the Jambalaya boxes, but I will anywise... I would really rather not see recent catalogs (GB#3 had 3 recent North American catalogs, I pulled them out) or instructions in general. These (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | | | Gee Frank, you should have let me know about the miscolored bucket before you mailed me GB#3... I'm a fool for a deal, and I'm looking for some canidates to play LEGO meets a Dremel... (I am anticipating some homebrew pneumatic parts that are going (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | (...) I can agree with this, we need to keep them interesting :) I also agree on the catalogs if they are older ones you have a few extra of and want to contribute those, that's fine. Though anything in the last 3 years I'd have to say everyone's (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: General Box #5 (& #4) —Doug Finney
|
| | | | | | GB #4 finally arrived today (UPS was *slow*) so I'll chime in on this subject as well. There's no paper in this one and I'm not adding any. I definitely agree about recent catalogs but I would think older catalogs (and instructions) are likely to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Developing Trends (was: Re: General Box #5 (& #4)) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe people who are interested in these things should post a message. When a box turns up with an excess of wheels or regular bricks, it could be sent to that person next. Or, when someone gets a box that has "too much" of some common (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) You tricked me! ;-) I read this at first and agreed that it wasn't your place, but that was foolish of me. The whole point of posting what I took and added was to include the community. Thanks Frank, your points are well taken. I've removed (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Because it's cute and cheap? It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't come in EVERY blasted Freestyle/Classic/Basic set. What would be best is if they just put them into the smaller sets (then people who like them can easily get some, and those of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | Chris Weeks wrote, re eye and mouth bricks: (...) What a great idea! Hey, how about a "return to Lego" box... everyone puts in the stuff they hate and TLC is last on the list. It might give them a hint! Kevin (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Return to LEGO (was Re: General Box #5) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) :-) Actually, that would entail everyone paying an increasing load as the box grew. OTOH, if it all went to a central hub and then were shipped from there, that would minimize shipping expense. I'm moving in the next month sometime, but after (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Return to LEGO (was Re: General Box #5) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | Yes. Now make sure to ship it to Brad J, so he knows what NOT to offer through LD ;-) He can just check all of our Wants pages to see what SHOULD be offered. Hmmmm, that being said...I think we should talk to Kevin Loch or Todd about setting up a (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) You WANT the green slopes with chicken from #6? I'll be splitting 30 or more into my parts bins soon, so if you want all 30+ printed slopes, we can talk Trade, just see my Wants page ;-) (URL) Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General Box #5 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) My test for if an element is COMPLETELY worthless is whether Nik (8 in April) will take it. If he won't... Needless to say, he won't take 1x1 eyes. Craigo used 2 in his dinosaurs which I think is the first time I've ever seen them used for (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
