Subject:
|
Re: Can ebay feedback get worse than this:
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:39:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
485 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, Bianca Nebab writes:
> Eh, s/he's back. Looks like they re-bid minutes after you canceled. That is grounds
> for having the user suspended.
Thanks, I have just re-cancelled it. I have also mailed ebay. What was I
saying about giving people the benefit of the doubt...
Scott A
>
> "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G55EBA.Js4@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.market.auction, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.market.auction, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > >
> > > > Can ebay feedback get worse than this:
> > > > http://cgi2.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=michaelamiguet
> > > >
> > > > Scott A
> > >
> > > I'll go with yes, it could be worse. :-) It could be in English so more
> > > people could see how badly this user got lambasted, or there could be more
> > > of it than 6 entries.
> > >
> > > But thematically, I have to agree with you, it's pretty bad.
> > >
> > > ++Lar
> >
> > I think ebay has a limit of -4 before a user is NaRUed. In the past, I have
> > dealt with 2 LUGNET users who had similar feedback levels - and had no
> > problems (However, I was a little more cautious than usual). I suppose, I
> > know I should give people the benefit of the doubt - but I still cancelled
> > the bid "michaelamiguet" made on this lot:
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=511977045
> >
> > Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
