Subject:
|
Re: Msg from DTRH - Re: "Exclusivity" at DTRH?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:02:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
nickie@dtrh.&nomorespam&com
|
Viewed:
|
481 times
|
| |
|
|
Just an add'l note - maybe the exclusive policy was not a good idea -
I don't know. It apparently doesn't apply too well to Lego, but I
still think it would be helpful in many other situations.
But regardless whether it was good or bad policy, it *WAS* what I had
told my original customers, so therefore I've got to stick by it, with
those customers at least.
- Nickie
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Msg from DTRH - Re: "Exclusivity" at DTRH?
|
| (...) You've got my vote for a businessperson with integrity. If you make a committment you stick by it, all right, at least for the categories in effect, unless you get a win/win agreement, that includes everyone, to make a change. Sometimes (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Msg from DTRH - Re: "Exclusivity" at DTRH?
|
| Hello everyone, First, I'd like to publicly apologize to Gene & to Mike for ( inadvertedly) causing an uncomfortable situation for them. I never foresaw or intended anything like this to happen. Regarding the 'exclusivity' policy - as I explained to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
