Subject:
|
Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:25:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
Speaking of which, until we have modules, etc for a layout with hidden
controllers, does anyone have a spare 9V wire to sacrifice? What I'm thinking is
that if you get a 9V wire, cut one plate off and put a plug on it, you can feed
the "main" controller with wall voltage, box it up in Lego bricks/plates
completely, and feed it into another controller. That way the little kiddies
can't run the train fullspeed.
That's assuming the 2nd controller could handle the reduced voltage.
Tom McDonald wrote:
> Ugg.. Zonker-man speakum truth.. I'll be sure to do testing at home too. But
> the good thing is that there won't be any (shouldn't be any) "unskilled
> handling" and "creative re-building" of stock like there was at BayLUG's first
> meeting, not that it wasn't fun for some :-)
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?
|
| (...) Ugg.. Zonker-man speakum truth.. I'll be sure to do testing at home too. But the good thing is that there won't be any (shouldn't be any) "unskilled handling" and "creative re-building" of stock like there was at BayLUG's first meeting, not (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
