Subject:
|
Electricity in layout (was Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 04:11:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
867 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, Tom Stangl writes:
> Speaking of which, until we have modules, etc for a layout with hidden
> controllers, does anyone have a spare 9V wire to sacrifice? What I'm • thinking is
> that if you get a 9V wire, cut one plate off and put a plug on it, you can • feed
> the "main" controller with wall voltage, box it up in Lego bricks/plates
> completely, and feed it into another controller. That way the little kiddies
> can't run the train fullspeed.
>
> That's assuming the 2nd controller could handle the reduced voltage.
It might not. I don't like doing that cuz IMO it'll strain the 317 regulator
to put out what it's supposed to. Even if it could put out 9V with a 7.5V
supply, I can't imagine the current remaining the same. I know we're using DC
loads, but we don't want to have to worry about more than one motor on a track
overloading the circuit, esp. since more than motor usually indicates a
loooong (and therefore heavy) train. Maybe someone who has done it can shed
some light if it does indeed work.
-Tom McD.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?
|
| Speaking of which, until we have modules, etc for a layout with hidden controllers, does anyone have a spare 9V wire to sacrifice? What I'm thinking is that if you get a 9V wire, cut one plate off and put a plug on it, you can feed the "main" (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
