Subject:
|
RE: New LEGO groups?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Aug 1999 14:46:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
537 times
|
| |
|
|
Kill them.
a group for us.ca.ba is fine with me.
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
> [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> Of Todd Lehman
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 11:14 AM
> To: lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: New LEGO groups?
>
>
> In lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, ba-lego@cinnamon.com (Zonker Harris) writes:
> > [...]
> > In our case, getting the website up makes it easier for folks to
> > find the groups in their area. (Of course, that would imply that
> > the websites are also submitted to a few of the search engines. :-)
>
> Say, how far from around California do folks travel to attend BayLUG
> meetings? One of the reasons for the complete hierarchical revamp of
> the www.lugnet.com website last month was to begin organizing
> links and
> resources topically -- and as close as possible to the
> discussion group
> homepages -- for browsing convenience, etc.
>
> BayLUG is currently linked to from the .loc.us.ca.sf homepage:
http://www.lugnet.com/loc/us/ca/sf/
but do you think it would be more helpful if it were also linked to from
other nearby pages? Certainly the subgroups of .sf and the main .ca
(California) group might make sense.
--Todd
p.s. Are the subgroups of .sf getting in the way? Should they be killed
or kept?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LEGO groups?
|
| (...) Say, how far from around California do folks travel to attend BayLUG meetings? One of the reasons for the complete hierarchical revamp of the www.lugnet.com website last month was to begin organizing links and resources topically -- and as (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
